When Labour was elected in 1997 many of us looked forward to a future
free from Thatcherism and a slavish adherence to the market economy, a
future where the needs of people would be put before the demands of profit.
But it quickly became apparent that we had been the victims of spin and
double talk. The New Labour administration quickly jumped into bed with the
enemy and embraced the global economy with orgiastic enthusiasm.
Trade and industry secretary, Stephen Byers, announced that "wealth
creation is more important than wealth distribution", and Peter
Mandelson declared that "we are intensely relaxed about people getting
filthy rich". Was Mandelson referring to the nation’s workers or Tony’s
new cronies?
Labour has since pushed ahead with plans to extend the privatisation of
public services under the guise of private finance initiatives and public
private partnerships. It is clear to working people, including trade union
members, that New Labour is not delivering the goods.
Fire-fighters received a practical lesson in this when government
ministers directly interfered in pay negotiations. In July 2002 at the Local
Government Association conference, John Prescott instructed the national
employers not to reach agreement on an evolving offer. Again, on ‘the
night of the long knives’ in November 2002, Ministers thwarted a potential
deal that could have avoided an eight-day strike.
This government’s motives for interfering in the FBU dispute are clear.
This party of big business simply could not allow public-sector workers to
assert themselves and win a pay rise.
What kind of signal would that have sent to the millions of workers on
minimum wage and casual, zero-hour contract jobs? They just might organise
themselves and follow the lead given by the FBU! Blair’s new friends would
not have liked that!
Our conference decision means we still have a political fund available
for political aims and objects, but no longer have to pay for the dubious
honour of being shafted by the class traitors in the Labour Party!
This union will continue to campaign politically, but with the support of
parties and individuals who identify with our objectives. We recognise the
need for a voice and influence in parliament but we also recognise that New
Labour is no more representative of the aims of the FBU than any of the
other capitalist, establishment parties!
We must see that we are only at one point in history, just as our
comrades were at the turn of the 20th century when forming the
Labour Party. Working people can never expect a fair shake in a political
and economic system designed and operated by capitalists. Successive Labour
governments have attempted to function within that system by serving the
interests of the capitalist economy as opposed to the interests of the
people who make the economy. It is impossible to serve two masters.
In recent years, trade unionists have voiced their disapproval at the
direction of New Labour. The RMT decided to fund Scottish Socialist Party
candidates and were expelled from Labour. The CWU has said that if the
government proceeds with plans for privatisation it will withdraw funding
from Labour.
The FBU has actually disaffiliated and other unions are reducing their
funding as a measure to placate the growing call from their members for
disaffiliation. A political vacuum now exists that can only be filled by a
party that will represent faithfully the interests of workers in parliament.
As this tide of opposition grows, trade unionists can only repeat the
initiative taken by the founders of Labour and build a new political party.
Such a party can be and must be a socialist party!